Why I’m Not Self-Publishing . . . And Might Someday

blog pic

By Anne Garboczi Evans

I’ve been writing full-length novels for 12 years now and seriously submitting book proposals to the traditional powers-that-be for the last four years. Recently, I joined a self-publishing authors group on Facebook. And can I say, I’m drooling.

These authors talk of finishing a book and publishing it the next week. They mention putting out 15 books in a year and their 25 books on Amazon. Many of them are making quite decent money too. And here I am, sitting on my couch, staring at a laptop full of finished, unpublished manuscripts. “So why don’t you just self-publish?” many people have asked me.

This is why. First, funding. While some self-publishing packages for e-book only may even be free, a self-publishing option that includes print books and provides a great editor and an excellent sales team could easily cost you $5,000-15,000. I just don’t have that kind of money on hand, and if I did, it would go to the mortgage, not a self-publishing gig. Second, those editors I was talking about. When you pay 5,000+ to self-publish, a lot of that money goes to your editor.

In a traditional publishing house, the editor is extremely critical because, if your book doesn’t turn out good enough to sell prolifically, the publishing house is out money. Your self-publishing editor has no such incentive to tear your book to shreds. Besides, you’re the customer. If the editor is too critical of your book, you might walk away and hire someone else. Someday when I’ve published multiple bestsellers, I’ll be confident enough in my writing to want such an editor. Right now, I want an editor who will make my manuscript bleed red ink. Third, prestige. A self-publishing company executive at a writers’ conference I attended called traditional publishers the new “vanity presses.” His reasoning was, everyone wants that traditional publisher label on their manuscript even if the traditional publisher turns out junk books. The reason I want the prestige of a traditional publisher isn’t vanity (I hope 😉 ).

Rather, I want that prestige to help build my author platform. When I’m a best-selling author, I’ll have credibility in my own right. For now though, I’d like to feed off a traditional publisher’s credibility. So far I’ve dwelt on the negatives of self-publishing, but there are some spectacular advantages too. Many traditional houses only put out one of an author’s books per year. Putting out three or four books a year not only makes you more money, but keeps your name fresh in readers’ minds.

I recently read an article about a woman who published with a Big 6 New York publisher every year, but also self-published on the side. The New York publisher’s annual releases gave her a prestige that kept the self-published books flying off the shelf. The self-published books earned her a pretty penny above what she was getting in her New York royalty checks. I think this author has combined the best of both worlds. So someday when I’ve had a few years of Big 6 publishing successes and paychecks, maybe I’ll try some self-published books on the side. (I especially have my eyes on Indie for an Ancient Rome Series I wrote that I know I’d never convince a traditional publishing editor to buy.) Until then, you can look for me buried under that pile of rejection letters on my couch.

Writing Prompt: Have you or could you ever see yourself self-published? Share some of the pros and cons self-publishing would have for you. Is there any particular book you’ve written that you think would fit well into the self-publishing world? https://www.facebook.com/annegarboczievans

7 thoughts on “Why I’m Not Self-Publishing . . . And Might Someday

  1. I used to think I’d never self-publish. Lately, I’ve considered the idea of doing both. First, though, I think it’s important (for me) to gain more of name. Plus, I do like the credibility a traditional publisher provides.

  2. Thanks for responding, Sandy! Is there anything in particular that has changed your mind about self-publishing? I know I love hearing everyone’s success story.

  3. I still like the idea of traditional publication. But I can see where it would be an advantage to someone who already has that established fan base and can rely on their readers to follow them to a self-published book–as long as the product is as good. It’s not for me right now, but like you, I haven’t ruled it out for the future. 🙂

  4. Anne, great post–full of great ideas. I agree with you. Quite a few fellow authors and friend have encouraged me to self-publish, but I am holding out for a traditional publisher. It helps having a strong agent backing your work 🙂 Perhaps in the future I might contemplate more seriously self-pubbing on a supplemental basis–something that might even lead to more sales of my traditional novels but not the other way around.

  5. Agreed Elaine about the advantages of having a great lit agent! And I too would love to explore self-publishing in that order as a supplement to traditional publishing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.